In short
After a taxpayer self-assesses and files returns, the GST law gives officers a graded set of tools - scrutiny, provisional, best-judgment and summary assessment, departmental and special audit, and demand notices under sections 73, 74 and 74A - to test that self-assessment. Running the other way, section 54 lets a taxpayer recover tax that was never meant to stick: export/zero-rated refunds, inverted-duty refunds and excess cash-ledger balances. E-invoicing under Rule 48(4) is the compliance backbone that feeds all of this, because an Invoice Reference Number (IRN) is what makes a B2B invoice valid at all. This is core CA Final/Inter Taxation (GST) territory, and it is the single most practical area in indirect-tax interviews at the Big Four, mid-size GST practices, and in-house tax teams.
Explained
Assessment: the five routes beyond self-assessment
- Self-assessment (s.59): every registered person assesses their own tax and files GSTR-1/3B. Everything below is a response to that.
- Provisional assessment (s.60): where the taxpayer cannot determine value or rate, they apply (ASMT-01); the officer may permit provisional payment on a bond with security (max 25% of bond amount). Final assessment within 6 months, extendable by the Joint/Additional Commissioner by 6 months and by the Commissioner by up to 4 years. Interest payable on short payment; refund with interest if excess.
- Scrutiny of returns (s.61): officer compares returns with available data (GSTR-1 vs 3B vs 2B vs e-way bills) and issues ASMT-10; taxpayer replies in ASMT-11 within 30 days (extendable). If explanation is accepted, ASMT-12 closes it; if not, the officer moves to s.65/66/67 or a demand under s.73/74/74A. Scrutiny is a *discrepancy intimation*, not a demand.
- Best-judgment assessment of non-filers (s.62): where a return is not filed even after a s.46 notice (GSTR-3A), the officer assesses on best judgment in ASMT-13 within 5 years from the due date of the annual return. Key relief: if the taxpayer files the valid return within 60 days of the ASMT-13 order (or within a further 60 days with late fee and interest), the order is deemed withdrawn - but interest and late fee survive.
- Assessment of unregistered persons (s.63): a person liable to register but unregistered, or whose registration is cancelled yet was liable to pay tax - best-judgment assessment within 5 years of the due date of the annual return, after a show-cause notice (ASMT-14 → ASMT-15).
- Summary assessment (s.64): with the Additional/Joint Commissioner's prior permission, where there is evidence of tax liability and delay would prejudice revenue - order in ASMT-16. The taxpayer may apply in ASMT-17 within 30 days for withdrawal; withdrawal order in ASMT-18.
Audit: annual return, departmental audit and special audit
- GSTR-9 (annual return): due 31 December following the financial year. Optional for taxpayers with aggregate turnover up to ₹2 crore. Composition dealers file GSTR-9A; e-commerce operators collecting TCS file GSTR-9B.
- GSTR-9C (reconciliation statement): required where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore, reconciling the annual return with the audited financial statements. Since FY 2020-21 it is self-certified: the earlier mandatory audit and certification by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant under s.35(5) was omitted by the Finance Act, 2021. Interviewers still ask this - "GST audit by a CA" as a statutory annual requirement no longer exists.
- Departmental audit (s.65): the Commissioner or an authorised officer audits a registered person at their place of business or in the office. Notice in ADT-01 at least 15 working days in advance; audit to be completed within 3 months from commencement (date records are made available), extendable by the Commissioner by up to 6 months. Findings, rights and obligations communicated in ADT-02 within 30 days. Detection of unpaid tax leads to proceedings under s.73/74/74A.
- Special audit (s.66): at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry or investigation, an officer not below Assistant Commissioner, with the Commissioner's prior approval, may direct a special audit where value has not been correctly declared or credit wrongly availed. Direction in ADT-03; audit by a CA or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner (not chosen by the taxpayer); report in ADT-04 within 90 days, extendable by a further 90 days. The Commissioner bears the audit fee. Opportunity of being heard is mandatory before using the findings.
- Other powers: inspection, search and seizure (s.67), inspection of goods in movement (s.68), power to summon (s.70), access to business premises for audit/verification (s.71), officers to assist (s.72).
Demands and recovery
- s.73 - short payment/wrong credit not involving fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; s.74 - where it does. These apply up to FY 2023-24.
- s.74A (inserted by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, applicable from FY 2024-25): one common provision and one common limitation - notice within 42 months from the due date of the annual return (or from the date of erroneous refund), order within 12 months of the notice, extendable by 6 months. Penalty is 10% of tax or ₹10,000, whichever is higher for non-fraud cases and 100% of tax for fraud cases, with graded reductions for early payment.
- Interest (s.50): 18% p.a. on delayed payment of tax; 18% on ITC wrongly availed and utilised (Rule 88B - interest only if utilised). No interest on tax paid through the cash ledger balance already deposited by the due date.
- Appeals: Appellate Authority under s.107 - within 3 months of communication of order (condonable by 1 month), pre-deposit of full admitted liability plus 10% of disputed tax, capped at ₹20 crore of CGST (the cap was reduced from ₹25 crore by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024; the 10% rate is unchanged). Appeal to the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) under s.112 within 3 months of the appellate order, with an additional 10% of disputed tax, capped at ₹20 crore. Then High Court (s.117, substantial question of law) and Supreme Court (s.118). Advance ruling sits separately under ss.95-106 (AAR → AAAR).
Refunds under section 54
- Who can claim what:
- Zero-rated supplies (exports and supplies to SEZ) - either (a) export with payment of IGST and claim refund of IGST under Rule 96 (the shipping bill is treated as the application), or (b) export under LUT/bond without payment and claim refund of unutilised ITC under Rule 89(4).
- Inverted duty structure - input tax rate higher than output tax rate (Rule 89(5)); refund of ITC on inputs only, not input services or capital goods.
- Deemed exports, refund to the supplier or the recipient.
- Excess balance in the electronic cash ledger - no 2-year limit issue, straightforward.
- Tax paid on a supply not provided or partly provided, refund of advance where no invoice is issued.
- Refund arising from a judgment, appeal or revision.
- Wrong-head payment - IGST paid instead of CGST+SGST or vice versa (s.77 of CGST Act / s.19 of IGST Act); relevant date is the date of correct payment, and no interest is charged.
- UN bodies, embassies and notified agencies holding a UIN; Canteen Stores Department; refund to international tourists under s.15 of the IGST Act (framework only, not operational).
- Process: application in RFD-01 on the portal within 2 years from the relevant date (Explanation 2 to s.54 defines a relevant date for each category - e.g. date the ship/aircraft leaves India for goods exported by sea/air, date of receipt of payment or invoice for services, due date of the return for unutilised ITC). Acknowledgement RFD-02, deficiency memo RFD-03 (a fresh application is then needed), provisional sanction RFD-04, payment order RFD-05, final order RFD-06, withholding/adjustment RFD-07, notice RFD-08, reply RFD-09.
- Timelines: order within 60 days of receipt of a complete application. Provisional refund of 90% of the claim for zero-rated supplies within 7 days of acknowledgement, without scrutiny, if the claimant has not been prosecuted for an offence above ₹250 lakh in the preceding 5 years.
- Interest on delayed refund (s.56): 6% p.a. after 60 days from receipt of application; 9% p.a. where refund arises from an order in appeal or further proceedings and is delayed beyond 60 days from the application following that order.
- Restrictions: minimum refund ₹1,000 (not applicable to excess cash-ledger balance); no refund of unutilised ITC where goods exported are subject to export duty, or where the supplier claims duty drawback of central tax or refund of IGST paid on exports; no refund of ITC on nil-rated or exempt output (credit is simply not available). Unjust enrichment - the claimant must prove incidence was not passed on (a CA/CMA certificate is required if the claim exceeds ₹2 lakh; self-declaration below that); otherwise the amount goes to the Consumer Welfare Fund (s.57/58). Rule 96B: if export proceeds are not realised within the FEMA period, the refund must be repaid within 30 days of the expiry.
- Refund may be withheld if the person has not filed returns or has an unpaid demand (s.54(10)-(11)).
E-invoicing (Rule 48(4)) and the digital chain
- What it is: the supplier reports invoice data in schema INV-01 (JSON) to an Invoice Registration Portal (IRP), which validates it, assigns a unique IRN (a 64-character hash of GSTIN + document type + number + FY), digitally signs it and returns a signed QR code. The IRP does not create the invoice; the taxpayer's own system does.
- Applicability: mandatory where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in any financial year from 2017-18 onwards (threshold reduced in stages: ₹500 cr → ₹100 cr → ₹50 cr → ₹20 cr → ₹10 cr → ₹5 crore from 1 August 2023). Once covered, always covered.
- Covered documents: tax invoices, credit notes and debit notes for B2B supplies, supplies to SEZ units/developers, exports and deemed exports, and invoices under RCM where the supplier is registered. Not B2C invoices (a dynamic QR code applies separately to B2C for taxpayers above ₹500 crore), not bills of supply, not delivery challans, not ISD invoices.
- Exempt entities (notified, irrespective of turnover): SEZ units (SEZ developers are covered), insurers, banking companies and NBFCs, goods transport agencies, passenger transport services, and multiplex cinema admission services; also government departments and local authorities.
- Consequence of non-compliance: Rule 48(5) - an invoice required to be issued with an IRN but issued without one is not a valid invoice, so the recipient cannot claim ITC, and penalty under s.122 follows.
- Operational rules: cancellation on the IRP is allowed only within 24 hours of IRN generation (and only if no e-way bill is active); thereafter a credit note is the remedy. Reporting is subject to a 30-day limit from the invoice date for taxpayers with AATO of ₹10 crore and above (effective 1 April 2025; earlier ₹100 crore and above from 1 November 2023).
- Why it matters downstream: e-invoice data auto-populates GSTR-1, flows into the recipient's GSTR-2B, and generates Part A of the e-way bill - so scrutiny under s.61 is now largely machine-driven. The Invoice Management System (IMS), live from October 2024, lets a recipient accept, reject or keep pending each inward invoice, which then shapes GSTR-2B and ITC.
- Related current features: auto-populated GSTR-3B liability is hard-locked (non-editable, corrections to be made through GSTR-1A), and returns cannot be filed after 3 years from their due date (s.37/39/44/52 bar, operational from 1 July 2025).
- Rate context: GST rates are 5%, 18% and 40% since 22 September 2025 (plus nil and the special rates for bullion and specified goods), and the compensation cess ended on 1 February 2026 - refund and demand computations for periods before and after must use the rate in force then.
Key points
- Self-assessment (s.59) - the default; every other assessment is the department testing it.
- ASMT-10/11/12 - scrutiny discrepancy notice, taxpayer reply, acceptance order; scrutiny is not a demand.
- s.62 best-judgment - for non-filers; order deemed withdrawn if the return is filed within 60 days (further 60 with late fee).
- s.60 provisional assessment - taxpayer-initiated, on bond with security up to 25%; finalise in 6 months.
- s.64 summary assessment - needs Additional/Joint Commissioner's permission and evidence of liability with risk to revenue.
- Statutory GST audit by a CA is gone - s.35(5) was omitted by the Finance Act, 2021; GSTR-9C is self-certified above ₹5 crore.
- s.65 departmental audit - ADT-01 notice 15 working days ahead, 3 months (+6), findings in ADT-02 within 30 days.
- s.66 special audit - Commissioner's approval, CA/CMA nominated by the Commissioner, 90+90 days, fee paid by the department.
- s.73 / s.74 / s.74A - non-fraud / fraud / common provision from FY 2024-25 (42-month notice, 12-month order).
- Appeal pre-deposit - 10% of disputed tax capped at ₹20 crore CGST before the Appellate Authority; a further 10% before the GSTAT.
- s.54 refund - RFD-01 within 2 years of the relevant date; order in 60 days; 90% provisional for zero-rated in 7 days.
- Inverted duty refund - ITC on inputs only; input services and capital goods are excluded.
- No ITC refund where the exported goods bear export duty, or where drawback of central tax / IGST refund is claimed.
- Interest - 18% on delayed tax (s.50), 6% on delayed refund, 9% where the refund follows an appellate order (s.56).
- Unjust enrichment - CA/CMA certificate if the claim exceeds ₹2 lakh; otherwise to the Consumer Welfare Fund.
- E-invoicing - Rule 48(4), AATO above ₹5 crore, IRN + signed QR from the IRP; no IRN means no valid invoice and no ITC.
- E-invoice limits - cancel on IRP within 24 hours; report within 30 days of invoice date if AATO is ₹10 crore or more.
- Three-year bar - GST returns cannot be filed beyond 3 years from the due date (from 1 July 2025).
Formulas and examples
Refund Amount = (Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods + Turnover of zero-rated supply of services) × Net ITC ÷ Adjusted Total Turnover
Net ITC = ITC availed on inputs and input services during the period (capital goods excluded). Adjusted Total Turnover = total turnover excluding exempt supplies (other than zero-rated) and the value of the zero-rated services computed per the rule. The value of zero-rated goods is capped at 1.5 times the like domestic value. All amounts in ₹.
Maximum Refund = {Turnover of inverted-rated supply of goods and services × Net ITC ÷ Adjusted Total Turnover} − {Tax payable on such inverted-rated supply × Net ITC ÷ ITC availed on inputs and input services}
Here Net ITC = ITC availed on inputs only. The second limb (added by Notification 14/2022-CT from 5 July 2022) strips out the credit attributable to input services.
Interest on delayed refund (s.56): Interest = Refund × 6% × (days beyond 60 from the date of application ÷ 365); 9% where the refund arises from an appellate or other order.
Example 1 - Inverted duty structure refund. A fabric processor's outputs are taxed at 5%; its chemicals and dyes bear 18%.
- Turnover of inverted-rated supply of goods = ₹80,00,000; other taxable supplies = ₹20,00,000 → Adjusted Total Turnover = ₹1,00,00,000.
- Net ITC (inputs only) = ₹12,00,000; total ITC availed on inputs and input services = ₹14,00,000.
- Tax payable on inverted-rated supply = 5% × 80,00,000 = ₹4,00,000.
- First limb = 80,00,000 × 12,00,000 ÷ 1,00,00,000 = ₹9,60,000.
- Second limb = 4,00,000 × 12,00,000 ÷ 14,00,000 = ₹3,42,857.
- Maximum refund = 9,60,000 − 3,42,857 = ₹6,17,143.
Example 2 - Zero-rated refund and provisional sanction. An exporter supplies under LUT without payment of IGST.
- Zero-rated supply of goods (FOB) = ₹60,00,000; domestic taxable supplies = ₹40,00,000 → Adjusted Total Turnover = ₹1,00,00,000; Net ITC = ₹9,00,000.
- Refund = 60,00,000 × 9,00,000 ÷ 1,00,00,000 = ₹5,40,000.
- Provisional refund (90%) = ₹4,86,000 in RFD-04 within 7 days of the RFD-02 acknowledgement; the balance ₹54,000 on final order in RFD-06.
Example 3 - Interest on a delayed refund. The ₹5,40,000 claim above is acknowledged on 10 April 2026 and paid on 20 August 2026.
- 60 days from 10 April 2026 expire on 9 June 2026; delay = 21 days (June) + 31 (July) + 20 (August) = 72 days.
- Interest = 5,40,000 × 6% × 72 ÷ 365 = 32,400 × 0.19726 = ₹6,391 (payable under s.56 without a separate claim).
Example 4 - Penalty exposure on the same demand, s.73 vs s.74. ITC of ₹5,00,000 was wrongly availed and utilised for FY 2022-23; tax is paid 400 days after the due date.
- Interest = 5,00,000 × 18% × 400 ÷ 365 = 90,000 × 1.09589 = ₹98,630.
| Stage of payment | s.73 (no fraud) | s.74 (fraud/suppression) |
|---|---|---|
| Before any notice (voluntary, DRC-03) | Nil penalty | 15% = ₹75,000 |
| Within 30 days of the show-cause notice | Nil penalty | 25% = ₹1,25,000 |
| Within 30 days of the order | 10% of tax or ₹10,000, higher = ₹50,000 | 50% = ₹2,50,000 |
| Beyond that | ₹50,000 | 100% = ₹5,00,000 |
For FY 2024-25 onwards the same facts fall under s.74A, with penalty of 10% of tax or ₹10,000 (higher) for non-fraud and 100% for fraud; the non-fraud nil-penalty window on payment after notice is 60 days.
Example 5 - Pre-deposit for appeals. An order confirms tax ₹40,00,000, interest ₹7,00,000 and penalty ₹4,00,000. The taxpayer admits ₹10,00,000 of the tax and disputes ₹30,00,000.
- Before the Appellate Authority: admitted ₹10,00,000 + 10% × 30,00,000 = ₹3,00,000 → ₹13,00,000.
- Before the GSTAT: a further 10% × 30,00,000 = ₹3,00,000 (each 10% capped at ₹20 crore of CGST). Recovery of the balance stays stayed once the pre-deposit is made.
| Assessment | Section | Form | Trigger | Time limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisional | 60 | ASMT-01/04 | Value or rate uncertain | Final in 6 months (+6, +4 years) |
| Scrutiny | 61 | ASMT-10/11/12 | Discrepancy in returns | Reply in 30 days |
| Best judgment (non-filer) | 62 | ASMT-13 | Return not filed after s.46 notice | 5 years from annual return due date |
| Unregistered person | 63 | ASMT-14/15 | Liable but unregistered | 5 years from annual return due date |
| Summary | 64 | ASMT-16/17/18 | Evidence of liability, risk to revenue | Withdrawal application in 30 days |
Where it is used
- Big Four and mid-tier indirect-tax practices (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG, BDO, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan): drafting ASMT-11 replies, DRC-06 submissions, refund applications and appeals with pre-deposit computations.
- Exporters and SEZ suppliers - textiles in Tiruppur, pharma in Hyderabad, engineering goods in Pune, IT/ITeS services exporters: monthly LUT-based Rule 89(4) refund claims are a continuous working-capital function.
- Inverted-duty industries - fertilisers, textiles and job work, railway parts, LPG, edible oils, EV components: Rule 89(5) claims are a recurring revenue item.
- In-house tax and ERP teams at manufacturers and retailers: e-invoicing integration (SAP/Oracle/Tally to IRP via GSP or API), the 30-day reporting clock, IMS actions and GSTR-2B reconciliation.
- Job roles: GST Executive/Assistant Manager - Indirect Tax, litigation and refunds specialist, GST audit support for departmental s.65 audits, GST reconciliation analyst, and GSP/ASP product roles (ClearTax, Zoho, Cygnet, Masters India).
- Statutory and internal auditors use GSTR-9/9C reconciliations and ITC-vs-2B differences as standard audit procedures, and disclose GST demands as contingent liabilities.
Interview questions
- Q: Is a GST audit by a Chartered Accountant still mandatory? A: No - section 35(5) was omitted by the Finance Act, 2021; from FY 2020-21 the taxpayer files a self-certified GSTR-9C where turnover exceeds ₹5 crore. Departmental audit (s.65) and special audit (s.66) continue.
- Q: Difference between a departmental audit and a special audit? A: A s.65 audit is conducted by departmental officers after ADT-01 notice; a s.66 special audit is done by a CA/CMA nominated by the Commissioner, with the Commissioner's prior approval and the fee borne by the department.
- Q: A client ignored notices and got a best-judgment order under s.62. Any remedy short of appeal? A: Yes - filing the valid return within 60 days of the order (or a further 60 days with late fee and interest) makes the order deemed withdrawn, though interest and late fee remain payable.
- Q: Why is input service credit excluded from an inverted-duty refund? A: Section 54(3) read with Rule 89(5) restricts the refund to credit on inputs; the Supreme Court upheld this in *Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India (P) Ltd.* (2021), and the formula's second limb removes the input-service share.
- Q: What are the two routes for exporting, and which is better? A: Export with payment of IGST and claim an IGST refund (shipping bill as the application, faster and automatic), or export under LUT/bond without payment and claim unutilised ITC under Rule 89(4) - better where you have no IGST liability to fund but a large credit pool.
- Q: Can a refund claim be rejected for being late if filed on day 731? A: Yes - the two-year limit from the relevant date under s.54(1) is statutory; a deficiency memo in RFD-03 requires a fresh application, so a deficiency near the limit can be fatal.
- Q: What is the relevant date for a refund of excess cash-ledger balance? A: It is the date of payment of tax, but the limitation is practically not restrictive - such refunds are claimed under s.49(6)/54(1) and are not subject to the unjust-enrichment test.
- Q: Interest rates to remember on refunds? A: 6% p.a. for delay beyond 60 days from the refund application (s.56), and 9% p.a. where the refund arises from an appellate or court order and is delayed beyond 60 days.
- Q: Who is exempt from e-invoicing even above the turnover threshold? A: SEZ units, insurers, banks and NBFCs, goods transport agencies, passenger transport operators and multiplex cinema admission services; SEZ developers are not exempt.
- Q: A supplier above ₹5 crore issues a B2B invoice without an IRN - what happens to the buyer's ITC? A: Rule 48(5) makes the document not a valid invoice, so ITC is not available to the recipient and the supplier faces penalty under s.122; the fix is to cancel/re-issue with an IRN within the permitted window.
- Q: Can an e-invoice be amended? A: Not on the IRP - it can only be cancelled within 24 hours (if no active e-way bill); otherwise corrections are made through a credit/debit note with its own IRN, and in GSTR-1/1A.
- Q: What is the pre-deposit for a first appeal now? A: Full admitted liability plus 10% of the disputed tax, capped at ₹20 crore of CGST - the cap was cut from ₹25 crore by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (it is the GSTAT pre-deposit that fell from 20%/₹50 crore to 10%/₹20 crore).
- Q: Why was s.74A introduced? A: To give one common limitation and procedure for demands from FY 2024-25 onwards - 42 months from the annual-return due date for the notice and 12 months for the order - removing the different timelines of ss.73 and 74.
Common mistakes
- Treating an ASMT-10 scrutiny notice as a demand and paying with penalty, instead of replying in ASMT-11 and seeking closure in ASMT-12.
- Saying "GST audit must be done by a CA above ₹2 crore" - the statutory audit was removed; the GSTR-9 threshold (₹2 crore, optional below) is confused with the GSTR-9C threshold (₹5 crore).
- Including input services or capital goods in Net ITC for a Rule 89(5) inverted-duty claim, or forgetting the second limb of the formula.
- Using total turnover instead of adjusted total turnover in Rule 89(4), or ignoring the 1.5× like-domestic-value cap on exported goods.
- Computing interest on delayed refund from the date of the refund order rather than from the 61st day after the application.
- Claiming both duty drawback of central tax and an ITC/IGST refund on the same export - expressly barred, and a common notice trigger.
- Missing that the s.62 order is withdrawable by filing the return and going straight to an appeal with a 10% pre-deposit.
- Assuming the special auditor can be the company's own statutory auditor or that the company pays the fee - the Commissioner nominates and pays.
- Overlooking the 30-day e-invoice reporting limit (AATO ₹10 crore and above) and the 3-year bar on filing returns, both of which are hard portal validations.
Related topics
GST basics · GST: input tax credit and returns in practice · GST: supply, time, place and value of supply · Income tax assessments, notices, appeals and faceless proceedings · Customs duty basics · TDS and tax filing basics