Knowledge / Placement essentials (aptitude, reasoning, verbal, communication, interviews, Excel, workplace) / Simplification and approximation

Simplification and approximation

Placement essentials (aptitude, reasoning, verbal, communication, interviews, Excel, workplace) (All) · Quantitative aptitude · free study notes for exams, placements and interviews

In short

Simplification means reducing a long numerical expression to a single exact value using a fixed order of operations; approximation means replacing awkward numbers with convenient ones to reach the nearest answer among the options. Both are the fastest-scoring sections of almost every Indian aptitude paper — IBPS/SBI PO and Clerk, RRB NTPC, SSC CGL/CHSL, and the first round of TCS NQT, Infosys, Wipro, Capgemini and Cognizant tests, where 5 to 15 marks come from these alone; CAT/XAT do not label them but reward exactly the same arithmetic speed. Universities examine the same skills inside "Engineering Mathematics / Quantitative Techniques" and "Soft Skills and Aptitude" papers under AICTE's model curriculum employability courses. The aim is accuracy at speed: 12 to 20 seconds per question with no calculator and, in most online tests, no rough-work sheet beyond one page. On the job the same habit shows up as a sanity check — spotting that a quoted figure is off by a factor of ten before it goes into a report.

Explained

The order of operations: BODMAS and VBODMAS

Simplification techniques that actually save time

Approximation: the discipline of controlled error

Verification and self-check methods

Speed-maths toolkit worth memorising

Exam pattern and marking reality (Indian tests)

Key points

Formulas and examples

BODMAS order: Vinculum → Brackets ( ) { } [ ] → Of / Order (powers, roots) → Division and Multiplication (left to right) → Addition and Subtraction (left to right)
a² − b² = (a + b)(a − b); (a ± b)² = a² ± 2ab + b²; (a + b)³ = a³ + 3a²b + 3ab² + b³
Use for N × M where N = base + x, M = base − x (units: pure numbers)
Square of a number ending in 5: (10n + 5)² = 100·n·(n + 1) + 25
Indices: aᵐ·aⁿ = aᵐ⁺ⁿ ; aᵐ/aⁿ = aᵐ⁻ⁿ ; (aᵐ)ⁿ = amn ; a⁻ⁿ = 1/aⁿ ; a1/n = ⁿ√a ; a⁰ = 1 (a ≠ 0)
Surd rationalisation: 1/(√a + √b) = (√a − √b)/(a − b)
Recurring decimal to fraction: 0.x̄ = x/9 ; 0.x̄ȳ = xy/99 ; 0.pq̄r̄ = (pqr − p)/990 (p = non-recurring digits)
Nested radical (n radicals): √(x√(x√x…)) = x(2ⁿ − 1)/2ⁿ ; infinite nesting → x
Successive percentage change: net % = a + b + (a·b)/100, where a and b are signed percentage changes
Percentage error of an approximation: % error = |approx − exact| / exact × 100
Digit-sum rule: DS(A × B) ≡ DS(DS(A) × DS(B)) (mod 9); DS(A + B) ≡ DS(A) + DS(B) (mod 9)
Square-root bracketing: if a² < N < (a+1)², then √N ≈ a + (N − a²)/(2a + 1)

Fraction–percentage conversion table (memorise):

FractionPercentageFractionPercentage
1/250%1/911.11%
1/333.33%1/119.09%
1/425%1/128.33%
1/520%1/166.25%
1/616.67%2/366.67%
1/714.29%3/475%
1/812.5%3/837.5%
1/1010%5/862.5%

Example 1 — Strict BODMAS with a vinculum and nested brackets

Simplify: 48 ÷ 6 × 3 + [25 − {12 − (8 − 5 − 3)}] − 2², with a vinculum over the 5 − 3

Example 2 — Fraction expression by cancellation

Simplify: (3/7 of 1,400) ÷ (0.6 × 25) + 11/4 × 8/33

Example 3 — Approximation, bank-exam style

What approximate value comes in place of ?: (1,249.97 ÷ 24.98) × (√2,116 + 15.02% of 799.8)

Break it into the three pieces asked:

Example 4 — Opposite rounding and error control

Estimate 4,932 × 1,987 and compare rounding strategies.

MethodWorkingResult% error
Both rounded up5,000 × 2,00010,000,000+2.04%
Opposite rounding4,900 × 2,0009,800,000+0.001%
Difference-of-squares(4,932+1,987)/2 = 3,459.5; not symmetric — not useful here——
Exact4,932 × 1,9879,799,8840

Opposite rounding (one factor down 0.65%, the other up 0.65%) almost cancels the error; rounding both up compounds it to about 200,000. With options 500,000 apart either works — with options 100,000 apart, only the second does.

Example 5 — Surds, indices and a digit-sum verification

Simplify: (√5 + √3)/(√5 − √3) + 3⁴ ÷ 9 × 2⁻¹

Example 6 — Running all three checks on a product

A candidate computes 3,847 × 56 = 215,432. Check it.

Where it is used

Interview questions

Common mistakes

Related topics

Open in the Knowledge reader →Find jobs →